Friday, May 27, 2016

State pays RTI activist Rs10L for not protecting him

Times of India: Mimbai: Friday, May 27, 2016.
In a first of its kind, the home department led by chief minister Devendra Fadanvis has paid Rs 10 lakh to an RTI activist as interim compensation for failing to protect him from a violent attack. The move follows an order passed by the State Human Rights Commission headed by former Chief Justice S R Bannurmath.
Justice Bhannurmath had passed the order on September 2, 2015, while a cheque of Rs 10 lakh was handed over to the activist, Arun Sawant, by a senior official of the Thane Police commissionerate a week ago. "The order was passed on September 2, 2015 and was submitted to the home department for further instructions. After the proposal was approved, a cheque was handed over to the RTI activist at his Kulgaon home in Thane district,'' a senior IPS official told TOI on Thursday.
An SHRC official said it was found that the state government was reluctant to implement the order, as the commission does not have executive powers to implement its directives. "I think, in the recent past, it is highest amount paid to an RTI activist. We are glad the Fadnavis government has implemented the order,'' he said.
Since RTI activist Arun Sawant had sought specific information on a section of politicians and public servant, he was apprehending danger to his life. In fact, on February 9, 2010, Sawant had requested the Thane police commissioner to provide him police protection but his plea was ignored by law-enforcement agencies. Two persons fired two rounds at him and he was seriously injured on February 26, 2010.
During the course of hearing before Justice Bannurmath and SHRC member B D More, a senior police official submitted that Sawant had refused police protection and that he was not a social worker and was misusing the RTI Act. Subsequently, the SHRC had summoned the Thane police commissioner but no senior officer was present before the commission.
A Thane police official, who was present, was unable to establish that Sawant's track record was bad and he refused police protection. "In the absence of documentary evidence, the commission finds that the entire story of alleged inquiry or approach to Sawant on various dates is a self-serving, after thought story put up by police in its defence... the request of the complainant for protection was dated February 9, 2010, and as he was not provided security within 15 days, he was attacked... after going through the entire records and arguments addressed by both sides, the commission finds that there is utter negligence and apathy on the part of the police in not providing timely protection to Sawant,'' Justice Bannurmath observed.
Justice Bannurmath pointed out that the police officials' apathy and insensitivity probably appeared to be out of prejudice towards Sawant's RTI activities and especially as the inquiry was against two powerful and influential public servants.