Sunday, May 01, 2016

Junior slaps fine on senior officer, rescinds order

Times of India‎‎‎‎‎: Chandigarh: Sunday, May 01, 2016.
A junior official of the Haryana forest department slapped a fine of Rs 5,000 on his senior an Indian Forest Service (IFS) officer for not providing information under the RTI Act. However, realizing how peculiar the situation was, he withdrew the order two days later.
This prompted Haryana state information commissioner Hemant Atri to express surprise over the state of affairs in the department. The commission, on Friday, also decided to issue a show cause notice to the IFS officer Jitender Ahlawat, posted as divisional forest officer at Karnal, asking him to explain why penalty up to Rs 25,000 should not be imposed on him.
The series of events started about six months back when Karnal-based lawyer Parvesh Mehta sought information regarding encroachment on the protected forest land near National Highway-1 (NH-1) in the town. Dissatisfied with the response of the forest officials, Mehta in February approached the commission. His appeal was forwarded to the Rohtak's conservator of forests, who was the first appellate authority (FAA) in the case.
Meanwhile, on April 20, a superintendent posted in the office of conservator of forests Rajbir Singh imposed a penalty of Rs 5,000 on Ahlawat, who is state public information officer (SPIO) in the case, for terming the application a questionnaire. In an official communication, Singh, who is also assistant state public information officer (ASPIO) into the matter, asked Ahlawat to provide complete information to the applicant.
Though, when Singh realized the mistake, he wrote another letter to the SPIO to inform him that previous letter has been withdrawn urging him to take appropriate action.
During the hearing on Friday, the commission noted the "severe discrepancy" wherein the ASPIO penalized the SPIO without any powers. "Neither the superintendent is a competent authority nor the FAA (first appellate authority) can impose penalty, which is sole prerogative of the commission under the RTI Act," said Atri in the order.