Tuesday, August 04, 2015

Disaster relief: Only 40% of funds worth Rs 250 crore used in 14 years

Economic Times: New Delhi: Tuesday, 04 August 2015.
When earthquakes, floods, cloudbursts or natural calamities devastate a state and uproot people, what does the affected region need? Funds for rehabilitation, you would think. However, official data reveals that even after more than a decade, states have not spent all the money that's been pledged.
Call it a problem of plenty or a sheer lackadaisical attitude states haven't identified rehabilitation work and used the funds given by concerned lawmakers.
ET filed an application under the Right to Information ( RTI) Act and found that after every natural calamity of "severe nature," parliamentarians pledge funds for rehabilitation that remain unutilised for several years. These funds are advanced under the Members of Parliament Local Area Development Scheme (MPLADS).
According to the MPLADS norms, MPs can recommend up to Rs 1 crore for rehabilitation in the event of a calamity of "severe nature". The first time MPs committed funds for rehabilitation was after the 2001 Gujarat quake. Data provided by the Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, the nodal ministry keeping track of these funds, reveals that even after 14 years, all the funds have not been used. Of the Rs 250 crore committed by MPs, Rs 99 crore, or about 40%, has been used up.
Since the Gujarat earthquake, MPLADS funds have also been pledged for the tsunami (2004), Kosi floods (2008), Cyclone Aila in West Bengal (2009), cloudburst in Leh (2010), earthquake in Darjeeling (2011), Sikkim earthquake (2011), Uttarakhand disaster (2013) and floods in J&K(2014).
ET view
There is something downright unholy about disaster relief being crippled not by any shortage of funds but by funds left unutilised. This shows apathy of disastrous proportions. Any rehabilitation package or relief scheme must come with a progress report that includes fund targets and whether they have reached their destinations. Information technology must be used to track the trajectory of these funds, making it possible to reallocate them transparently. To have relief money rot is a scandal that has to be fixed retrospectively as well as before another natural calamity.