Times
of India: New Delhi: Monday, 25 August 2014.
The Central
Information Commission has directed the Delhi High Court to amend its RTI fee
rules, indicating that they were not in conformity with the provisions of the
Right to Information Act.
The case
reached CIC after Patiala House court demanded Rs 50 from an applicant for
filing first appeal against the reply provided by its central public
information officer under the RTI Act.
The Delhi HC,
while exercising its power under Section 28 (1) of the Right to Information
Act, made the Delhi District Court (Right to Information Rules, 2008) under
which Rule 11 deals with the provision concerning charging of fees during first
appeal.
According to
the RTI Act, fee can only be charged at the stage of filing of the RTI
application. The transparency law does not have any provision of levying fee at
the stage of first appeal within a department or second appeal before the
commission.
"Imposing
a fee of Rs 50 as mandatory requirement at the first appeal level is not in
consonance with the fee structure prescribed by Act and rules by central
government. Except Rs 10 fee at the stage of filing request for information
with the PIO, the law does not prescribe any fee at any stage including at the
second appeal level at the information commission," information
commissioner Sridhar Acharyulu said in his order.
The
commission recommended that Delhi HC amend the rules to bring it in conformity
with RTI Act, for effective provision of access to information and to bring
uniformity with the rules made by DoPT which are also followed by the Supreme
Court.