Sunday, July 20, 2014

Corruption in Jammu & Kashmir: A Multiple Organ Failure : There are several perspectives on corruption in our state and it would be prudent to examine them - PROF GULL WANI

GreaterKashmir.com: Hyderabad: Sunday, July 20, 2014.
Corruption, a hydra headed monster, is once again dotting the headlines of leading newspapers in our state. Top leaders of the two leading regional political parties- Omar Abdullah (NC) and Mehbooba Mufti (PDP) are locked in a sort of verbal fight over who is corrupt? Addressing a public meeting at Ramban, Omar Abdullah urged people to invoke RTI in order to find out charges of corruption against elements recently recruited in PDP organizational apparatus. Mehbooba Mufti, in return, lashed out at Omar Abdullah for granting extension to 400 ‘blue eyed officials’ and raised a very pertinent issue related to the fact that Chief Minister himself is in charge of entire investigation machinery to unravel the mystery of corruption. There are several perspectives on corruption in our state and it would be prudent to examine them. But let me hasten to add that while experts and common people may hit left right and centre to pin- point the causes of corruption I would argue that corruption in J&K is an issue of multiple organ failure.
First, there are those who argue that corruption is a universal phenomenon. After all, is there any place in the world which can be described as a virgin land, and free of corruption? True that corruption is prevalent in western societies as well but there it always comes as a shock and does not meet with social approval. This is not true of our part of the world. Indira Gandhi as Prime Minister said that corruption is a universal phenomenon. Rajiv Gandhi expressed his helplessness in admitting that 85 percent of plan resources do not reach the common man in India though, of course, he did not admit that this was largely a result of corruption, including among political elites. After all there is something called human DNA and how it is imprinted with a natural propensity to favour the kith and kin. John Steinbeck –American author, who got Noble prize for Literature in 1962 wrote, “The things we admire in men - kindness, generosity, openness, honesty, understanding and feeling are the concomitants of failure in our system. And those traits we detest sharpness, greed, self-interst, acquisitiveness, meaness, egotism are the traits of success. While men admire the quality of the first they love the produce of the second.’’
Second, there are those who fault the Indian state for using corruption as an instrument to achieve certain political objectives in Jammu & Kashmir. Recently in an NDTV discussion, Dr. Haseeb Drabu, an economist of eminence, pointed towards it albeit as a passing reference. The discussion was centered on Article 370 of Indian Constitution. The main advocate of theory of state connivance has been former Vice Chancellor of Kashmir University Prof. Riyaz Punjabi. He presented the findings of his paper in a seminar organized by Department of Economics, University of Kashmir way back in 1989 on “Polity, Economy and Society in Jammu Kashmir’’. His paper got published in Mainstream on March 16, 1991. He opined, “The normal democratic process in Jammu & Kashmir was disrupted with the arrest of Sheikh Mohammad Abdullah in 1953. The alienation of a large majority of the people of state in post 1953 era and formation of Plebiscite Front posed a great threat to the cohesion of India. It was in this context that corruption as a model to bring about national integration was applied to the state of Jammu &Kashmir.” The theory remained subject matter of debate in New Delhi’s elite academic circles in 1990s. To the best of my knowledge Prof Punjabi has not so far revised his thesis. Be that, as it may, there are, of course, sociologists and political scientists who attest to this theory of corruption. John Waterbury-Global professor of political science at New York University in Journal of “World Politics’’ stated that corruption in the form of patronage and spoils checks the alienation of minorities. Michael Gohuston, political scientist, in a research paper  in journal of Comparative Politics (July, 1986) “on political consequences of corruption’’  also draws a clear cut distinction between integrative and disintegrative corruption, the former links the people and groups and the latter cause’s serious conflicts. While Indian State has to share the blame for committing wrongs from time to time and adopting an ostrich type of an approach in its dealings with Kashmir the fact is that for a clear understanding of a complex issue we need to look at corruption in J&K as a matter of multiple organ failure. The failure is noticeable in certain domains of our body politic.
a)    The Institution of politic: Kashmir like other parts of South Asia has historically been witness to a strong society and a weak state. The state has two domains- coercive and developmental. It is the former which is more visible than the latter. Though Kashmir society is undergoing change and transformation yet the fact is as stated by V S Naipaul the politics of a country can only be an extension of its human relationships. David Mulford, former US Ambassador to India, in a leaked diplomatic cable reported: corruption cuts across party lines and most Kashmirirs take it as an article of faith that politically connected Kashmirirs take money from India and Pakistan. One of the most disfiguring things about Hurriyat and Mainstream politics is intellectual closure where only what people thought leaders wanted to hear percolated up. Leaders of all hues are cocooned in their own platitudes. Politics before 1947 was intellectually stimulating and ideas were powerful. Leadership of all hues was honest and full of integrity. Today politics is parochial, personal, polluted and punitive. Both parties - PDP and National Conference approach issues related to corruption in a lawyerly fashion. Effective governance can not be ensured in a manner where you score points against each other by launching arguments. In public life what is important is that criticism is based on policy not on personalities.
b)    Crisis of Institutions: In a society which has gone through a prolonged period of crisis a network of institutions is needed to mediate the conflict, ensure fairplay and adjudicate truth. We have reached a point where every institution from state legislature, media, burucracy have turned dysfunctional incapable of carrying out its mandate. Our educational institutions have turned into arid deserts. This has created a sense of permanent crisis.
c)    Emerging Classes: In Kashmir we have a triad of political economy with a very rich class of people some of whom have started marrying political parties. The dominant mode of our economy is largely state-controlled and hence the business/politician nexus has fattened. There is also a growing middle class who are quite articulate and composed of as Andre Beteille (sociologist) wrote many factors like wealth, income, occupation and education. This class in Kashmir as in other parts of India is aspirational and hungry for wealth and patronage. Before 1947 Kashmir middle class though small in size gave voice to voiceless and did not speak for themselves. Today they thrive on patronage, wealth and connections to the power structure. The last but not least is the growing class of poor who get government contractual and daily wage jobs with Rs 4000 salary  per month and have found other ways to feed their mobile phone and family as well. This class has widened in size due to growing decline of agriculture and skill less education at bottom level of our educational ladder. This huge army has found in theft as an alternative to survive in a consumer culture. All this has resulted in certain disequilibrium in the society. Different actors-civil society, opinion leaders, preachers, talkers and teachers have to act together. The more important role is to be played by the political leadership. The 19th century England was also corrupt but William Gladstone –highly religious and committed to values of integrity became Prime Minister four times and was able to clear the system. The quality of political leadership together with quality of education will determine the course of our future history. The  moving poem of Munir Niazi-a Pakistani poet comes to my mind.