Economic Times: Bengaluru: Friday, November 24, 2017.
When
Shashidhar, a resident of CV Raman Nagar, approached the Major Roads Department
of the Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike recently with a Right to Information
application, he was directed to the BBMP’s RTI Cell.
Similarly on
Friday, the BBMP’s Welfare Department re- fused to accept an RTI application
from this correspondent, insisting it had to be filed with the RTI Cell. The
State Information Commission has now recommended that this decade-old,
understaffed RTI Cell be shut, primarily in reaction to the BBMP’s various
departments shrugging off their responsibility in accepting RTI applications
relevant to them.
According to
the RTI Act, public information officers (PIOs) or assistant public information
officers of government departments are required to accept RTI applications from
citizens pertaining to their departments.
The BBMP established
the RTI Cell in 2006 to help citizens unfamiliar with the process or unable to
determine which department had to be approached for a specific information.
Back then, the RTI Act was new and a central office to receive applications for
all BBMP departments, including zonal offices, was appreciated. The departments
would continue to process applications received directly as well as through the
RTI Cell. Several of the BBMP’s 26 departments, however, refuse to accept RTI
applications, leading to inevitable delays in disclosing or sharing
information.
The State
Information Commission has proposed the closure of the BBMP’s RTI Cell so that
PIOs of its departments would have no option but to accept RTI applications,
said a BBMP official, declining to be identified. A proposal in this regard has
been sent to the BBMP Commissioner, he said. “We have been repeatedly telling
the departments not to send applicants to us,” said a staff member of the
RTI Cell, requesting anonymity.
“If a person
files an application in the Cell, it would take 3-4 days to reach the
department concerned. The countdown of 30 days for providing information starts
from the day the public information officer receives an application from the
RTI Cell.” The five-member RTI Cell receives 30-40 applications a day.
RTI activist
Sai Datta said that though the BBMP’s RTI Cell was set up with good intentions,
it has been misused. “The BBMP has to put dis- play boards with full
information about PIOs, APIOs and Appellate Authority outside every
department,” he said.
Vikram Simha,
a trustee at the RTI Study Centre nonprofit who played a pivotal role in the
establishment of the BBMP’s RTI Cell, said the State Information Commission had
no power to issue directives for its closure. “It’s purely the BBMP’s decision
to continue or close down (the RTI Cell),” he said.
“The Cell
helps people, specially those who are un- aware of the RTI process. Instead of
closing it, BBMP should ensure that the PIOs do not refuse to accept RTI
applications.”