Times of India: Mumbai: Tuesday,
March 26, 2013.
Chief
information commissioner Ratnakar Gaikwad has set at rest the prolonged debate
over whether the police manual is confidential or otherwise. In a landmark
order on Monday, Gaikwad held that within the meaning of the Right to
Information Act, the police manual is not a confidential document and a copy of
it should be provided to applicant P K Tiwari.
"The
police manual does not fall within the category of documents, which have been
exempted from disclosure. The applicant should be allowed to inspect the manual
and provided the relevant papers. The director general of police should put up
the entire police manual on the website of the state police within a month,''
Gaikwad said in his two-page order.
Tiwari had on
October 18, 2012, sought specific information on the police manual. Then he was
told to secure the copy of the manual from the government printing press and
that it's a priced publication. The press officials informed him that the police
manual is not in stock. Subsequently, when he again knocked at the doors of the
information officer, he was informed that the police manual is a confidential
document and that it was not possible to part with it.
When Tiwari
knocked at Gaikwad's doors, he held that under Section 8 of the RTI Act, there
shall be no obligation to give any citizen information, disclosure of which
would prejudicially affect the sovereignty and integrity of India, the
security, strategic, scientific or economic interest of the state, relation
with foreign state or lead to incitement of an offence. It also covers
information, which is expressly forbidden to be published by any court of law
or tribunal or the disclosure of which may constitute contempt of court.
Besides, information, the disclosure of which would cause a breach of privilege
of the parliament or state legislature is also under its purview. Information
received in confidence from foreign government or cabinet papers, including
records of deliberations of the council of ministers, secretaries and officers
or information which would impede the process of investigation or apprehension
or prosecution of offenders is also covered.
"Taking
into consideration the provisions of Section 8 of the RTI Act, it appears that refusal
to provide the police manual is wrong. The view taken by the public information
officer is contrary to the spirit of the RTI Act. It is essential for the
common man to know the provisions of the police manual. Competent authorities
should put up all such information on the website in larger public interest,''
Gaikwad observed.