Greater Kashmir: Srinagar: Wednesday, August 15, 2018.
The State
Information Commission has asked the Jammu and Kashmir Public Service
Commission to allow an appellant see all the sought information about judicial
service competitive examinations of 2013 after hearing two appeals about denial
of the same.
In response
to the appeal the SIC asked the Public Information Officer (PIO) of Jammu and
Kashmir Public Service Commission (PSC) not to deny the appellant information
sought by her under the J&K Rights To Information Act, 2009.
The SIC said
that the decision of the PSC was not in consonance with the provisions of the
RTI Act in force in the state, also citing the law laid down by the Apex Court
in this respect.
The appellant
had filed an RTI with the PIO, asking for complete merit list with breakup of
marks obtained by the candidates who have qualified Jammu and Kashmir Civil
Service (Judicial) Competitive examination 2013.
She had also
requested for the breakup of marks secured by a particular applicant who had
appeared in the exams and copy of the answer scripts of the mains examination
of all the subjects of the applicant.
The PIO vide
his communication no. PSC/Exm/RTI/53/2017 dated 24-10-2017 informed the applicant
in response to point that the marks cards were already available on the
Commission’s website.
To another
part of request for information, the PIO informed the appellant that PSC does
not provide the Xerox copies of evaluated answer scripts.
Aggrieved by
the response of the PIO, the appellant filed an appeal before the First
Appellate Authority (FAA), Secretary J&K PSC on Nov 25, 2017 arguing the
PIO has refused to provide information sought about the answer scripts.
The appellant
also contended that the information sought by her pertained to the appellant
and that the requested information was not exempted from disclosure under
section 8 of the J&K RTI Act, 2009.
The appellant
accordingly prayed that the PIO be directed to furnish the requisite information
and a reference under section 16(3) of the Act be made to the SIC.
The FAA
disposed of the 1st Appeal on February 2, 2018 stating the providing
information about answer scripts would reveal details of the evaluators which
is kept secret.
“The PIO
(Exams) has already provided the information sought by the applicant except the
Xerox copies of answer scripts as providing of Xerox copies of answer scripts
which usually bears the initials/signatures of evaluators and the same i.e.
Xerox copies may lead to disclosure of their particulars to the
candidates/Public,” the response to the RTI request reads.
“The
applicant is not entitled to have the names/particulars of evaluators as has
been held by the Supreme Court in SLP titled Kerala Public Service Commission
and ors Vs. State Information Commission and ors. However, the PIO (Exams) will
allow the inspection of answer scripts by the appellant under the close
supervision of the officer designated by the Commission for the purpose.”
The appellant
challenged the orders of PIO denying the specific information and also the
order of FAA disallowing Xerox copies of answer scripts but allowing just a
supervised inspection in the 2nd Appeal filed before the State Information
Commission.
The SIC
finally reached the conclusion that a public authority was under statutory
obligation to provide the information sought by the appellant in this case
under the provisions of RTI Act.
“Under this
Act, a public authority is under a statutory obligation to provide every kind
of information to an information seeker that comes within the ambit
‘information’ as defined in section 2(d) of the J&K Right to Information
Act, 2009. Section 2(d) defines the expression ‘information’ as any material
held by a public authority in any form including records, documents, e-mails,
opinions, advices, reports, papers etc. Answer script of a candidate is
available with an examination body in the form of record/document. Therefore,
answer script qualifies to be ‘information’ held by the examining body within
the meaning of section 2(d) of the J&K RTI Act to which a candidate can
seek access under the RTI Act,” the SIC directive reads.