Business Standard: New Delhi: Wednesday, July 04, 2018.
The Central
Information Commission dismissed 10 appeals filed by an applicant, saying he
was not interested in pursuing the matters diligently and his appeals would
clog the RTI administration system.
Information
Commissioner Yashovardhan Azad said Harpal Singh Rana filed more than 83
appeals and complaints against various authorities and he never chose to appear
before the commission in all such instances of past hearing.
Ten appeals
of Rana related to the Delhi government came up for hearing before Azad
recently when all officials concerned were present, obeying advance notices of
the commission, but Rana remained absent.
Activist
Subhash Agrawal who appeared for the government said Rana was a habitual
information seeker who kept on sending RTI requests to offices of the chief
minister, the GNCTD which were related to other public authorities.
Citing the
presence of 25 government officials for the hearing, Agrawal said that almost
every RTI application of Rana travelled up to the commission but he never
appeared for hearing.
Arguing the
case of the Delhi government, Agrawal told the commission that it resulted in
wastage of time of the public authorities, firstly by replying to incessant RTI
queries and then, by defending their replies before the panel.
After hearing
Agrawal, Azad noted that Rana neither appeared for hearing nor advanced any
submissions in support of his appeals.
The
commission draws adverse inference from the acts of appellant in making
repeated RTI applications with the respondent public authorities and
registering second appeals with this commission coupled with unexplained
absence in pursuing the matters diligently, Azad said.
He said
Rana's act of clogging the system of RTI administration was an inherent threat
to legitimate information seekers and establishment of a practical regime of
RTI in the nation.
The
commission is left with no doubt that the appellant falls within the category
of applicants, who...allowed to go unchecked would definitely ruin the goal of
achieving a practical regime of Right to Information, he said dismissing his 10
appeals in one go.