THE WEEK: New Delhi: Tuesday, June 05, 2018.
The Centre is
considering amendments to the Right to Information Act, 2005, confirmed the
Department of Personnel and Training in response to an RTI application. The
confirmation comes amid protests by activists over alleged attempts by the
government to “weaken” the iconic law.
“The matter
regarding amendment of the RTI Act, 2005 is under consideration and has not
reached finality. As per Section 8 (1) (i) of the RTI Act, 2005, information
requested by you cannot be supplied to you at this stage,” the DoPT said in
response to an RTI application filed by activist Shailesh Gandhi.
In the
application filed on 3 May, 2018, Gandhi had sought a copy of the proposed
amendments. He also asked for a copy of the record giving details of the
pre-legislative consultations that might have been taken place in the matter.
Gandhi, in
his plea, had also sought a confirmation if there was no proposal for a
pre-legislative consultation. The response was silent on this account,
prompting the activist to claim that it appears that the government wants to
carry out amendments without a pre-legislative consultation.
“It appears
it (the government) wants to undertake this nefarious action without any
pre-legislative consultation as required by Section 4 (1) (c) of the RTI Act,
which mandates that the government publish all relevant facts while formulating
important policies or announcing the decisions which affect public,” said the
former Chief Information Commissioner.
Referring to
reports that the government has shelved its plans to amend the RTI rules in the
face of opposition from the civil society, he said the rules of the act are
limited by the act, and amendments to the act are far more dangerous.
“When the
earlier government tried to amend the RTI Act thrice, citizens resisted and the
attempt was given up,” Gandhi said, adding that it is almost a foregone
conclusion that if the law is amended it will weaken the fundamental right to
information of the citizens.
RTI activists
have been alleging that the government has a draft amendment bill in place with
regard to the amendments that it plans to bring into the law, and has not
shared it for feedback from the public.