The Print: UP: Friday, June 08, 2018.
Over 15 lakh
candidates had applied for the 28,915 vacancies announced by the UP Police
Recruitment and Promotion Board in 2015.
New Delhi: A
recent notification by the Uttar Pradesh government announcing recruitment
results for the police force came with a curious caveat: No information
pertaining to the results will be provided under the RTI.
This is a
blatant violation of the RTI Act, which mandates every public body to be
transparent in its dealings with the common man.
The
notification dated 18 May, which announced the results for vacancies among
police constables and Provincial Armed Constabulary, lists the exact procedures
and criteria for selection, but adds: “No application will be entertained or
considered under the Right to Information Act, 2005, with regard to the information
being provided through this notice.”
More than 15
lakh candidates had applied for the 28,915 vacancies announced by the UP Police
Recruitment and Promotion Board in 2015.
ThePrint
reached the UP Police public relations officer for an explanation, but he did
not respond until the time of publishing this report.
‘An illegal
and unconstitutional notification’
“It is
absolutely illegal to arbitrarily declare that certain information will not be
granted under the RTI,” said RTI activist Anjali Bhardwaj.
By simply
declaring that any “related” information will not be shared, the authorities
are granting themselves blanket exception from a Central act, she explained.
“‘Related information’
is a catchall phrase,” she said, adding that the authorities could use such a
caveat to deny even basic information, like a certified photocopy of one’s
result.
However, the
clause could have more sinister consequences, Meerut-based activist Ravikanth
said.
“Such a
provision can be used to block certain candidates with complete opaqueness,
with the candidates having no means to question the grounds for their
rejection,” he said, calling the notification “unconstitutional”.
“This single
notification violates the Right to Information of 15 lakh candidates in one
stroke,” he added.
Rejected
candidates without answers
Ravikanth
cites Vishal Gautam, a candidate from the Scheduled Caste category, as a case
in point. Gautam was not recruited in the exercise despite scoring higher than
the cut-off set for reserved category candidates and, with the RTI out of
bounds, he has no way to find out why.
Ravikanth is
expected to soon move the National Commission for Scheduled Castes to highlight
Gautam’s case.
To be sure,
according to the UP RTI Rules, 2015, any information that “involves answers to
the question ‘why’, thus asking for reasons why a certain act was done or not
done”, is exempt from the law.
However,
according to Bhardwaj, there are other ways to know the reasons for one’s
rejection in an exam conducted by a government body, like asking for the
documents on which a decision is based.
‘What
explains this blanket exemption from RTI?’
Also,
Ravikanth said, if a certain provision of RTI rules is used to deny
information, it has to be explicitly invoked.
“The official
is obliged to invoke the exact rules under which he is denying information…What
explains the blanket refusal?” he asked.
While the
Supreme Court had recently held that marks for the civil services preliminary
examination would not be revealed under the RTI, no such exemption exists for
other government bodies.