Indian Express: Pune: Wednesday,
August 24, 2016.
CONSIDERED TO
be custodians of transparent laws in the state, the state information
commissioners (SICs) have traditionally been former bureaucrats a fact which
has raised concerns about the appointment process. Now, in response to an RTI
query raised by The Indian Express, the General Administration Department (GAD)
of the state government has revealed that in the past 10 years, not a single
advertisement was issued to fill up the positions.
Promulgated
in 2005, the RTI Act contains provision for appointment of SICs and a single
state chief information commissioner. These commissioners are supposed to
exercise their quasi judicial powers and help in implementation of the RTI Act
as well as hear second appeals under the Act. At present, the state has six SIC
bench with Ratnakar Gaikwad functioning as the state chief information
commissioner in Mumbai.
RTI Act
specifies that SICs to be eminent persons of “eminence in public life with wide
knowledge and experience in law, science and technology, social service,
management, journalism, mass media or administration and governance.”
Barring
journalist Vijay Kuvalekar, all other SICs in the Maharashtra have been former
bureaucrats, a fact which has drawn severe criticism from all quarters.
The GAD’s
reply to the RTI application now makes it clear that no advertisements were
ever issued inviting applications from the public for the post of SICs. This
newspaper had earlier reported how since 2005, the government had received 160
applications from people from various walks of life to fill up the positions
but it’s the bureaucrats who have won the battle. (“Professors, educationists
lose info panel race to ex-bureaucrats, IE April 18,2015).
Applications
without proper advertisement and publicity, RTI activist Vijay Kumbhar said was
meaningless and smacked of ‘match fixing’.”
“In my complaint
to the governor of the state, I have pointed out how this was almost synonymous
to paving the way for some people in a roundabout manner,” he said.
The state
government, Kumbhar said, had earlier filed affidavit in the court to frame
rules for appointments of SICs but that is yet to be done. “Appointments as
custodians of transparency should itself be fair and transparent. In the case
of Maharashtra, this is not being followed,” he said.