The Hindu: Kochi: Wednesday, October 29, 2014.
Justice A.
Muhamed Mustaque allowing a writ petition filed by Mannatil Kumar directed the
Public Information Officer of the Ministry to provide the information sought by
the petitioner.
The Kerala
High Court has directed the information officer in Union Ministry of Human
Resources Development, Central Information Commissioner, to pay a litigation
cost of Rs. 3,000 to an information seeker for refusing to provide him
information under the Right to Information Act.
Justice A.
Muhamed Mustaque while allowing a writ petition filed by Mannatil Kumar of
Kochi directed the Public Information Officer of the Ministry to provide the
information sought by the petitioner.
The
petitioner, a retired employee of Cochin Shipyard had sought information under
the Right to Information Act regarding the outcome on his representation filed
before the Minister of State for Human Resources. The representation
highlighted denial of growth opportunities of the Cochin Shipyard. As the
petitioner did not receive any response on his representation, he sought
information from the public information officer. The officer then replied that
the representation was “beyond the scope of responsibilities of Minister of
State for Human Resources”. The Central Information Commission had also rejected
his appeal against the department decision.
The court
observed that the information already available on the records had to be
supplied to the petitioner under the RTI Act. Seeking redressal of grievances
and obtaining information were different. As far as the Right to Information
Act was concerned, what was expected to be provided was regarding the
information that existed in available files. The nature of information sought
for was on the nature of disposal of his representation. It could be responded
by either stating that this was considered/not considered/what transpired on
the file. If nothing had been acted upon such representation, the information
officer could say so. It seemed that authorities had not understood the very
scope of seeking information under the Act.