The Hindu: Chandigarh: Monday, 28 July 2014.
Officials in
Haryana have raised the red flag over a clutch of hurried appointments
allegedly made in violations of rules by the Bhupinder Singh Hooda government
in Haryana to the State’s Right to Information Commission and the Right to
Service Commission (RTSC), widely seen as a sinecure for the Chief Minister’s
favourite retiring bureaucrats and loyalists.
On Sunday,
five of the eight members appointed to these Commissions were administered the
oath of office in an unpublicised ceremony at the Chief Minister’s residence.
The new appointees, whose names were cleared by outgoing Governor Jagannath
Pahadia on July 25, on the last day of his tenure, were sworn in without them
being given letters of appointment.
This, because
the Secretary, Administrative Reforms, Pradeep Kasni, refused to issue the
appointment letters and has put on record that since the appointments fall foul
of the provisions of the relevant Acts, the entire process of their selection
may be put up before the Governor. The appointments were cleared without Mr.
Pahadia being apprised about the violations, or there being any order of
appointment from his office.
Mr. Kasni
told The Hindu: “Officers must not be forced to implement blatantly illegal
orders issued by the political leadership. Those who do not do their bidding
are harassed in different ways.”
Haryana Chief
Secretary S.C. Chaudhary, whose name has been recommended as Chief Commissioner
of the Right to Service Commission (RTSC), has described Mr. Kasni’s
allegations as “baseless and incorrect.”
Mr. Kasni’s
note points out that the recommendation of the statutory committee headed by
the Chief Minister that cleared the names of Lt Gen (Retd.) Tonk, Dr. Amar
Singh, Sarban Singh (a serving IAS officer) and Sunil Katyal (an Additional
Advocate General) for RTS Commissioners are against the provisions of Section
13(3) of the RTS Act 2014, according to which at least two Commissioners must
be retired officers of the Haryana government in the rank of Administrative
Secretary.
The
recommendation of three persons as Information Commissioners was, according to
Mr. Kasni’s note, a violation of the RTI Act that stipulates that they should
not be holding any office of profit when the statutory committee clears their
names.